Page 1 of 2

DOWNLOADING CONCERTS - PLEASE READ

Posted: July 15, 2004 1:47 am
by RMM
Hi, everyone:

With the help of Grags (and offers from others), I have now learned how to upload concerts to a server. We are planning to have multiple concerts available for members to download.

Each song/track will be an MP3 file labeled with the concert name, date, Part One or Two, title of track, and the order of where it goes on that Part. If you include all of the tracks from each part, you can be assured that each Part will fit on a CD. Each concert will take two CD's. BTW, blank CD's are now down around 10 to 20 cents each if bought in 50 or 100 CD spindles. I am talking about name brands like TDK or Memorex through Circuit City or Best Buy when they are running sales.

You can pick through the recordings and use what you want. I like to delete the DJ talk, songs that were played on RM at intermission but not heard at the concert, and extra long periods of "crowd noise" between the encores. I like to include the band introductions, School Boy Heart (usually played at the concert during intermission), and the songs they have been playing when the License To Chill concerts are starting. These include "Hot, Hot, Hot" and either "Jump In The Line" or "Day-O", Harry Belafonte songs for those who are unfamiliar. However, if you don't care for them, you will be able to just exclude them from your recording. I think this way of relaying concerts will be much more flexible (and faster) than recording CD's and mailing them.

It will also allow me to offer a recording of the interview that Jimmy usually does in the half hour before a show if anyone is interested. You probably wouldn't want to put it on a CD. It's usually long enough that it can't be included on one of the two concert CD's.

It will also allow you to "plug" a good copy of a song from another concert to replace a song that had a big "gap" in it. A good example of this is the 2004 Indy concerts. I have a good copy of the 7-8-04 concert, but my copy of Pencil Thin Mustache from the 7-6-04 concert had a big gap in it. I edited out this gap, but it left a partial recording of Pencil Thin Mustache that is unsatisfactory to me. So, you could plug the 7-8-04 version into the 7-6-04 concert and get a much better recording IMHO and most people will never notice it. At any rate, the choice will be yours, not mine. Be sure that no reference to another venue is made or it will sound really strange!

Grags will provide easy, detailed instructions on how to download these concerts from his FTP site. It is easy to do.

Due to a large number of requests for it, I have edited and uploaded the East Troy, WI Alpine Valley 7-10-04 concert to him and he will make it available for downloading shortly. With the exception of a few momentary "blips", it is a good recording, IMHO. Look for an announcement in this forum from him when it is available.

I also plan to upload the following concerts to his FTP site as soon as possible:

Minneapolis, MN Target Center 5-20-04
Camden, NJ Tweeter Center 6-29-04
Cuyahoga Falls, OH Blossom Music Center 7-1-04
Bristow, VA Nissan Pavilion 7-3-04
Indianapolis, IN Verizon Wireless Center 7-6-04
Indianapolis, IN Verizon Wireless Center 7-8-04

I also have several RM Replays that I can make available if there is enough interest. I am trying to cut down on the mailing of concerts to individuals, as it is time consuming and I would rather spend my time editing concerts and making them available for downloading by all.

I encourage other members who have these concerts to download and compare them with mine and others. I have found that we all get different variations of concerts depending on what route the transmission takes through the Internet. I might have a good recording except for one song, while someone else might have a good copy of that song, but possibly not of others from that concert. I know from feedback that other members have had this problem. Together we can make better copies available to everyone, which is the whole intent of this forum, right?

I recommend marking songs/tracks that are definitely "defective" with a capital "X" to indicate that it could be improved upon. I am only talking about major problems, not momentary blips. I welcome feedback from others on this topic.

This problem was very apparent with the Denver concert, which I attended and recorded, but much of it was blank. I didn't get any of 5 songs and only parts of 4 others. Another member got a much better copy and made it available for downloading and now I have almost all of the concert. However, we both didn't get but about half of "Cheeseburger In Paradise", so I am trying to collect other recordings and put together a complete Denver concert. If I do, I will post that one. Can anyone else help?

Finally, if anyone who has requested copies of these concerts from me can download them instead of having me mail them a copy, please let me know. It would save me a lot of time.

Thanks,

RMM

Posted: July 15, 2004 10:35 am
by SeaNile
Can't wait. Sounds awesome. When will you have the site up so we can begin to enjoy these concerts?

--JK

Posted: July 15, 2004 10:40 am
by EVCIceman
Is there any way we can get them in a different format, or would other files just be too large?

Downloading Shows

Posted: July 15, 2004 1:21 pm
by wluprthd
Hello, I am new to this site but a big buffett fan. I have a buffett radio show at college and would love to have a live recording or two to put on the air. What is the GRAGS? site and where can I download these recordings. Also the Alpine show from the Tuesday, THursady, SAturday- or any show that Clint Black played at would be one that is a great show to download. Thanks a lot

Posted: July 15, 2004 1:22 pm
by TheWinoInOhio
This will be a great service to offer ... many thanks for going through all the trouble of planning it and (hopefully) making it useful. I look forward to the opportunity to hear some of the concerts I didn't catch on RM. Plus, it would be great if some of the solo Coral Reefer shows were available also. I would love to hear a Mac show also.

Posted: July 15, 2004 3:57 pm
by pooj
RMM....

Thanks a bunch for your efforts thus far. I can't wait to reinact this year's Alpine show for some of my friends who couldn't make it!

Fins Waaaaaaaaaaay Up!!!!! :D :D :D

Posted: July 15, 2004 5:00 pm
by grags
Ok, ok, people, patience please, patience. I will have the site up tomorrow, I promise. I just have a few tweaks to make yet.

To start with I will only have the 2004 Alpine show there. I have 99-2003 Alpine, and RMM is sending me more shows from this year like Indy, Minn., etc. I will get those up as soon as I can.

I only will have live shows up there that people can get to me. The only ones on CD that I have are the 99-03 Alpine shows. If others want to convert/rip their CDs to MP3s and upload them to me, I would be glad to host them.

Right now, it must be 5 o'clock somewhere (not here) so I'm going to get a Corona and sit on my deck in Wisconsin's beautiful 80 and sunny weather today. Fins up!!!

Posted: July 15, 2004 8:53 pm
by DrunkenIrish
I'm a little confused. Why would one concert of mp3 quality music take up two CD's? Aren't these .wav format? I know other formats would be a little larger, but could you at least use a lossless encoder like FLAC? I mean, if you're going to swap concerts shouldn't they be of decent quality? If you are really interested in running something like this, maybe a bittorrent system would work better. I'll include some links.

http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/

http://flac.sourceforge.net/download.html

http://www.sharingthegroove.org/msgboard/

MP3 quality

Posted: July 15, 2004 10:40 pm
by RMM
I will let Grags answer your questions, as he's the IT guy and you are WAY above my head technically. I only know that I am getting very good quality sound recording in MP3 and I had trouble trying to record in WAV with Replay Radio. I am not talking about MP3 CD's, but ones (not sure of the format) that can be played on any CD player after converting.

Why does MP3 get such a bad rap? I don't notice any deterioration in the sound quality, especially when I am recording a live concert that has gone out to RM and come back through the Internet.

You are entitled to your opinion, but you might try to be a little more diplomatic when voicing it. Just because you don't consider MP3 of "decent" qualilty doesn't mean others don't. Remember, this is a HOBBY. We are only trying to provide copies of concerts to fellow members who weren't able to do the recording themselves.

Very Very Pleased

Posted: July 16, 2004 3:39 pm
by GrwngOldrNotUP
What more to do at work on a Friday, still wasting away in margaritaville from last weekend, so lets get the show live. Major kudos out to grags and RMM for gettin this put together.
Went to the FTP site and had relatively few problems. It quit after track 14 citing errors so I closed went back in and copied track 15 to the end, no problem. Already played through it and can't wait to get it to cd. Work today is so much more of a breeze now.

Looking forward to other downloads

GrwingOldrNotUP :pirate:

Posted: July 16, 2004 3:45 pm
by GrwngOldrNotUP
I also second the WinoinOhio's suggestion for some Mac shows and other Coral Reefer solo sets. Know you guys are pluggin along with Buffett, I'm sure keeping you plenty busy, generatin the interest.

Posted: July 16, 2004 3:50 pm
by grags
I'm willing to host Mac shows or other COral Reefer & Club Trini stuff. I just don't have any of it, so someone who does, please PM me and we can talk about it.

Re: MP3 quality

Posted: July 16, 2004 3:53 pm
by DrunkenIrish
RMM wrote:I will let Grags answer your questions, as he's the IT guy and you are WAY above my head technically. I only know that I am getting very good quality sound recording in MP3 and I had trouble trying to record in WAV with Replay Radio. I am not talking about MP3 CD's, but ones (not sure of the format) that can be played on any CD player after converting.

Why does MP3 get such a bad rap? I don't notice any deterioration in the sound quality, especially when I am recording a live concert that has gone out to RM and come back through the Internet.

You are entitled to your opinion, but you might try to be a little more diplomatic when voicing it. Just because you don't consider MP3 of "decent" qualilty doesn't mean others don't. Remember, this is a HOBBY. We are only trying to provide copies of concerts to fellow members who weren't able to do the recording themselves.
I apologize if I was insulting, I was just making a suggestion. I know it's difficult to understand emotions on the internet, I should have been more clear. Mp3 gets a bad rap because when you convert from .wav (the format most of us record in, and the format that commercial CD's are filled with) to mp3 you are actually compressing the file. You know this because a wav file that is 60,000 kb is compressed to something more managable like 4,000 kb. When you compress the file, the program is taking out pieces of information to make the file smaller, but when you do this you are deteriorating the quality of the original music. FLAC is a program that can take a 60,000 kb file and compress it to 30,000 with no loss of quality, hence a lossless format.

You often can't hear the loss when you're playing on your headphones, or computer speakers because the cans or speakers usually aren't the highest quality. However if you put the files on a CD, or convert them to wav so you can play them on a decent stereo you will hear the loss. Most of the BNers that trade concerts use total recorder (http://www.highcriteria.com/), a very good and cheap program ($11), and it has many different options for recording music in different formats. I don't have any experience with Replay Radio.

As far as this being a hobby, I agree that we shouldn't take things too seriously (like the people who PAY for concerts), but I'm just telling you what others, me included, have been doing for years when we swap concerts. The napster movement has made mp3's the norm because they are so fast to transfer via P2P. It's kinda the norm out there to attempt to maintain the quality of the concert, check some of the other concert swapping sites out there.

recording quality

Posted: July 16, 2004 5:18 pm
by RMM
Okay. Sorry if I took offense. You obviously know much more about it than I do and you make some very good points. There is always a better way to do things, but sometimes the increase in quality is simply not worth the effort. Evidently when it comes to MP3 versus WAV, it is.

I only got into this when I was told about Replay Radio as a way to record financial radio programs, where quality obviously isn't a concern. I tried to record using it with WAV files, but had continual problems. Replay Radio then went to RM and set it up so I could record using MP3, which seemed to work great. Because they are live recordings, I figured it was good enough and I couldn't tell a difference.

I had heard complaints about MP3, but didn't know that compressing was that detrimental to the sound. Also, I'm 52 and definitely losing my hearing, so I probably can't hear the range of sound you can (too many loud rock concerts, motorcycles and fast cars in my misspent youth - I don't regret a minute of it, though.). So, I was thrilled with the quality I thought I was getting. Most people seem to be happy just to get a copy of the concert. I'm also old enough to be happy with digital TV and don't understand the obsession (and cost) of HDTV. Yes, it's great, but is it THAT much better? I don't think so, but my son disagrees with me. So, I guess it depends on your perspective and point of reference.

I have only been recording concerts since May, so you are obviously much more qualified to comment and I bow to your experience. I never did the Napster thing. I am just a Parrothead who was thrilled to find out I could get copies of concerts I attended. Then I got into recording and editing them for others who didn't even know how to do that. I have a number of people who wanted CD's, so I figured it would be better to offer concerts for download. I simply don't have time to be mailing CD's out to everybody who wants one, much as I would like to. I want to limit it to people who can't get/make their own CD's

I will look into Total Recorder, but it had better be pretty easy to use (what I like about Replay Radio). I don't know how much space Grags has to offer even if I did want to use WAV rather than MP3 and I am not technically knowledgable enough to try to run a FTP site myself (nor do I want to currently). Also, I've already paid $30 for Replay Radio, granted not a significant amount of money.

Do you know of a good editor to use with WAV files? I use MP3 Magic (offered by Replay Radio). I don't know if it would work with WAV files. It works very well with MP3.

So, thanks for a very good reply to my posting. If we can offer a better quality recording to fellow members, great. Can you assist? I don't have the time right now to re-learn how to do this.

Posted: July 16, 2004 9:31 pm
by flipflops
I must have missed something somewhere. Where is this wonderful website?

Posted: July 16, 2004 9:41 pm
by MacPhin
can you get the ft. lauderdale or tampa show from this past spring???

also, i missed the site while reading it. was it mentioned? sorry if i did.
thanks

Posted: July 16, 2004 10:01 pm
by Gumbo
I tend to think mp3 conversion isn't so bad with a streaming broadcast recording as opposed to say an original soundboard or a good audience recording. So in this case, I think mp3 format would be fine. Of course I have a fairly modest stereo so I don't have the ability to be as discriminate.

Ft. Lauderdale and Tampa shows

Posted: July 17, 2004 1:28 am
by RMM
Sorry, I don't have either of those shows. Anyone else?

Posted: July 17, 2004 2:59 am
by hawaiiboy
Hi RMM

I think that it is great that you folks are doing this

Here is a link to the program that I use for editing
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
it is free and works with Mac and Windows

Audacity

Posted: July 17, 2004 3:05 am
by RMM
Thank you very much!